CCDV-F Evaluation, Testing & Debugging EASY
PRODUCTION SCENARIO
A product manager writes the success criterion for a support-ticket classifier as "the model should classify tickets well." Engineering needs a criterion it can compute on every prompt change.

How should the criterion be rewritten?

Answering here is anonymous. Nothing is saved unless you sign in.

Show answer and explanation

Answer: An F1 score of at least 0.85 on a held-out set of 2,000 labelled tickets

Good criteria are specific and measurable on the thing being judged; the docs contrast the vague "classify sentiments well" with an F1 target on a held-out test set, which a pipeline can rerun on every prompt change. A coverage rate measures well-formed output, and a classifier can label 95% of tickets validly and wrongly. A support lead's rating needs a person for each iteration. Latency is an operational metric a fast but inaccurate classifier passes.
Free

Keep practicing CCDV-F

105 original CCDV-F practice questions, each with an explanation and a source link. No account needed.

Start free practice set → Timed, explained, free